Current:Home > reviewsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -TradeGrid
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Oliver James Montgomery View
Date:2025-04-07 04:27:21
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (463)
Related
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- A Mississippi university tries again to drop ‘Women’ from its name
- Lottery, casino bill heads to first test in Alabama Legislature
- College football coaching isn't nearing an apocalypse. It's changing, like every other job
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- The CDC may be reconsidering its COVID isolation guidance
- A radio station is now playing Beyoncé's country song after an outcry from fans
- Judge to consider whether to remove District Attorney Fani Willis from Georgia election case
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Oklahoma country radio station won't play Beyoncé's new song. Here's why
Ranking
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Nick and Aaron Carter's sister Bobbie Jean Carter's cause of death revealed: Reports
- Biden urges House to take up Ukraine and Israel aid package: Pass this bill immediately
- Greek lawmakers are debating a landmark bill to legalize same-sex marriage. Here’s what it means
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- How The Bachelor's Serene Russell Embraces Her Natural Curls After Struggles With Beauty Standards
- 1 person killed and 10 injured when vehicle crashes into emergency room in Austin, Texas
- Illegal border crossings from Mexico plunge after a record-high December, with fewer from Venezuela
Recommendation
Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
Alligator snapping turtle found far from home in English pond, is promptly named Fluffy
2 suspected gang members arrested after 4 killed in Los Angeles-area shootings
Romantic advice (regardless of your relationship status)
Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
What is Temu, and should you let your parents order from it?
When is Shane Gillis hosting 'SNL'? What to know about comedian's return after 2019 firing
Lyft shares rocket 62% over a typo in the company’s earnings release